Your monitoring data already holds the answer. The Impact Report and The Story Pack turn it into evidence funders act on.
Program teams collect far more data than they ever report. It sits in monitoring spreadsheets, case files and field forms, and by reporting time it has been flattened into a list of activities. Funders read activity lists and fund the organisation that showed them an outcome.
"We ran 42 workshops" is effort. It is not evidence that anything changed.
Without an agreed measure, every report argues a different case and none of them compound.
M&E writes for compliance, fundraising writes for appeal, and neither uses the other's material.
Each funder wants a different format, so staff spend delivery time reformatting the same truth.
We work with M&E leads and VPs of Programs to define what change looks like, find it in the data you hold, and build a reporting rhythm your team can sustain without extra headcount.
"We collect a lot of data but our reports still read like activity lists. How do we get to outcomes?"
Numbers persuade committees. Stories persuade people. The Story Pack takes the evidence from your impact work and turns it into narrative, quotes and visuals your fundraising team can use all year, told with dignity and never invented.
Consent and dignity are checked at step two, before anything is written.
The programs work. The data exists. What is missing is the bridge from monitoring spreadsheets to evidence a board or funder acts on. Four scenarios. Find yours.
Years of monitoring data sit in spreadsheets and survey tools, collected dutifully and read by nobody. Leadership suspects the programs work but says it with adjectives, not evidence.
Signal built from the exports that already exist: targets against actuals for one program first, with a plain-language summary a non-specialist reads in minutes.
The suspicion becomes a shown result. Leadership talks about programs with numbers that trace to sources, starting with one program in ten working days.
Five funders, five templates, five deadlines, one M&E lead. Most of the quarter goes to reformatting the same truth five ways, and none of it reaches the board.
One live evidence base with source-stamped charts, from which each funder report draws, plus the board summary that was never getting written.
The truth is assembled once and dressed five ways in days, not weeks. The board finally sees the same evidence the funders do.
Contracts increasingly pay on outcomes, and review meetings arrive faster than the analysis does. The team walks in with last quarter’s story and this quarter’s apology.
Targets against actuals live for every contracted measure, by site and cohort, with the gaps flagged while there is still time to act on them.
Review meetings start from a shared, current picture. Underperformance is caught mid-quarter, when it can still be fixed.
The fundraising team keeps losing bids for want of evidence. Program staff have the data but no time; fundraisers have the deadline but no numbers. The two teams barely meet.
The funder-ready evidence pack and the walkthrough that puts programs and fundraising in the same room, around the same charts.
Applications carry source-stamped evidence. The case for support rests on shown results, and the two teams finally share one story.
The data you already gather becomes the evidence you act on.
No individual service-user records leave your systems.
When impact is visible, fundraising follows.
Every organization has a number in its data that would stop a reader. Almost none has the time or the craft to find it and tell it. Four scenarios. Find yours.
The year-end appeal is planned, the list is ready, and the creative is a stock photo and a paragraph of adjectives. The team knows it needs one striking, true thing to say.
One finding mined from the campaign and program data, told as a written story, two or three source-stamped charts and a short video, sized for every channel.
The appeal leads with a verified number instead of an adjective, and every channel carries the same story in its own format.
One person runs communications: website, newsletter, socials, media calls. A data story is exactly what the channels need and exactly what there is no time or designer to make.
The full pack delivered done: story, charts and video, cleared for the channels, with the data behind them documented.
A professional data story ships without hiring anyone. The team of one publishes the same week and gets back to everything else.
A tenth anniversary is coming. The achievements are real but buried in annual reports, and the celebration risks being cake and generalities.
The decade’s data distilled to one finding that carries the whole story, told in the three formats, in the organization’s own brand.
The anniversary says one unforgettable, verified thing. The milestone becomes proof, and the proof becomes the next campaign.
Corporate partners and institutional funders do not respond to brochures. Every pitch meeting opens with claims the deck cannot back on the spot.
A source-stamped story built from delivery data, with charts that survive scrutiny and a short video for the follow-up email.
Pitches open with a verified finding instead of a promise. The diligence questions are answered before they are asked.
A single true number carries further than a report.
Every chart keeps its source, so it survives sharing and scrutiny.
Story, charts and video, publishable the same week.
One-pagers and use-case companions, two pages each.
We will show you what its data can already prove, and what it is one small change away from proving.
Choose what you are comfortable with. Nothing in the optional categories runs until you switch it on, and you can come back and change this whenever you like.
Needed for the site to work at all: security, load balancing and remembering this cookie choice. These cannot be switched off.
Helps us see which pages are useful so we can improve them. Aggregated, never used to identify you.
Used to measure campaigns and show relevant content elsewhere. Off unless you turn it on.